Tuesday, 13 October 2026

CRYSTAL LAKE - TV SERIES (2026) - Episodes 1 & 2 review and Q & A with Brad Caleb Kane and Linda Cardellini



Some of us are meant to wear masks". 

(This review is based on a preview screening at the Regent's Street Cinema, London, on 12th October 2026 of the first two episodes and quotes from the Q&A with showrunner Brad Caleb Kane and Emmy award winning lead Linda Cardellini). 

Mild spoilers ahead...

Four actresses have portrayed Pamela Voorhees on screen in the feature films within the Friday the13th franchise. Betsy Palmer, the iconic original in Friday the 13th (1980) and briefly in Part 2 (1981), Paula Shaw in Freddy vs. Jason (2003) - or at least Freddy's trickster version of her, Nana Visitor in a blink-and-you'll-miss-it appearance in the opening of the 2009 reboot, and now (finally) Linda Cardellini in A24's 8-episode TV series premiering on Sky and Now TV in the UK from 19th October 2026.

Friday the 13th fans (I include myself in this) have been (im)patiently waiting for a new full-length official film for 17 years, and whilst that wait still goes on, we do at least have this substantial prequel TV series to satiate us. Crystal Lake is a deep dive (no pun intended) into not only the tragic 'drowning' of young Jason and the fatal repercussions of this further down the storyline, but also into Mrs Voorhees' backstory and an exploration of how both Pamela (and Jason) respectively transition into the legendary fictional serial killers that we know (and love) today. 

As Linda Cardellini explained: "I knew her from the movie, but there's so little to see of her, but there's this incredibly wild mesmerising performance that Betsy Palmer gives". As the series is set 8/9 years before the events of the first Friday the 13th film, there's time to: "...figure out who she was until she gets to that point and who Jason was. And I'm always interested in the sort of making of the monster..."

Linda recognises that filling Betsy Palmer's shoes carries huge expectations and pressures: "There's a big opportunity there for somebody that the audiences really loved but didn't get quite enough of. So I just thought it could be fun - and daunting, of course, because people feel very, very devoted and serious about the franchise..."

Well, on the evidence of the first 2 episodes I caught it would appear that the project is in safe hands with both its showrunner Brad Caleb Kane, and in Linda Cardellini's nuanced and committed portrayal as Mrs Voorhees. As Brad stated in the Q&A, being a self-declared "die-hard, long-time fan" of the franchise himself, "I know also what Friday the 13th fans want". 

Brad recognised the need for authenticity (as much as possible) in terms of the setting -  "We shot this whole thing in New Jersey...no trees look like New Jersey trees" , this included the original Blairstown (even though the original camp wouldn't grant permission). The title credits mirror the original's and Brad even secured original composer Harry Manfredini to write original music for both the opening of the first episode, the regular title and end sequences - and yes, the infamous 'Ki,Ki,Ki, Ma, Ma, Ma' refrain is back too. In later episodes, Brad confirmed that the show will have: "shot-for-shot recreations of scenes from the movies" , including a whole episode where: "...we go full Friday the 13th, and it is a full night of like eight bodies dropping..."  

Fans will delight in seeing younger versions of 'Crazy' Ralph (Nick Cordileone), Officer Dorf (Cameron Scoggins), future camp owner Steve Christy (Dan Thompson), and truck driver Enos (Daniel Stewart Sherman). New characters include recently widowed police chief Levon Brooks (William Catlett) and his investigative journalist sister who I understand will uncover the full picture in later episodes. And of course there's Jason himself, played initially by Callum Vinson under a ton of prosthetics. His scenes with Linda Cardellini are poignant and beautifully played by both (although I defy anyone not to feel an amusing fission of foreshadowing when he playfully picks up a machete...)

There is a significant change in terms of the original's timeline - in Friday the 13th (1980), Jason supposedly drowns in 1957 whereas in Crystal Lake this has been updated to the early 1970's. There is also an additional story element involving a sinister organisation who come looking for Pamela. This is already in play in the first two episodes...  

Linda Cardellini is superb as the Camp Crystal Lake cook, former lounge-singer (who knew?) and fiercely protective and loving mum to her son Jason - the boy with significant physical deformities, who is prone to episodic fits and who is not a very good swimmer. She brings real pathos to the role and also (already after only 2 episodes) is chillingly convincing as someone who will do whatever it takes to defend all she holds dear.

In the first two episodes there's a couple of very gnarly deaths with copious amounts of spilt blood, although not from characters related to the original film, and showrunner Brad teases that there's plenty more where that came from: "There's a lot of brutal kills and gory moments in the season. There's a really, really brutal one in [episode] 3 where the switch really does gets flipped: so rage full." And music to the ears of Friday fans, Brad assures that: "The original movies are all practical effects. We knew that we would have to do all practical effects for this". 

Although the series is shot in widescreen, the photography feels authentic to the time period and thankfully the (death) curse of modern filmmakers to colour-grade practically all the colour out of the visual palate is not evidenced here as colours pop out (especially those blood reds...).

I'll be honest I could have watched the whole series then and there, but all good things come to those who wait.

To finish I'll leave you with Linda Cardellini's hopes for Crystal Lake: "I just hope people enjoy it...it's a wild ride." 

And Brad Caleb Kane's promise: "You ain't see nothing yet!" 

****

Paul Worts

    

Sunday, 8 March 2026

SCREAM 7 (2026)

This review contains spoilers.

Full disclosure: I’ve never been overly invested in this franchise. Sacrilege I know, but I still maintain that even Wes Craven’s original was (and still is) overrated - and I was there first night in the cinema on its initial release. 

The Scream films for me are the Scooby Doo of slashers with the masked killers often having less believable motivations than the villains Shaggy and the gang unmask (particularly here). Sure they’re watchable, disposable, slick, slice and dice Saturday night popcorn fare - but no more. And I know this will be seen as a ‘hot-take’ - it honestly isn’t meant to be - but I genuinely prefer ‘Scary Movie’ (the original) over Scream (1996).

7 is yet more of the same, with added nostalgic callbacks (one using AI which links to the Scooby Doo franchise once again) that feel clunky and overcompensating for the inherent weaknesses in the script, and the enforced big pay check return of Neve Campbell after the intended lead Melissa Barrera was disowned for expressing an opinion.

To be completely fair, there’s a nifty opening pre-credits sequence (only partially ruined by the trailer), which cleverly gets the obligatory backstory covered, a couple of gruesomely inventive deaths and some decent jump-scares along the way in its favour.

But the plot holes and implausibilities (yes, even by slasher standards) become gapping chasms which, for me, ultimately sink(hole) the final third - and don’t get me started on the actual killers, their reveals, and their weakest of weak motivations.

Some spoiler(ish) thoughts:

1. How many high schools happen to have a flying wire rig for a school play? (Clearly they must be better funded than schools in England).

2. What’s the point of an escape room if you can’t just safely STAY PUT in there and alert the authorities to your plight knowing the killer (or one of them) isn’t dead and still in the house.

3. When checking a house for residue Ghostfaces, don’t you think the police would have checked the attic (or haven’t any of them seen ‘Black Christmas’?)

4. Speaking of police, where the heck were they for the WHOLE of the final third?

5. I can accept a bullet-proof vest (it’s actually plausible), but how come the killers are even standing after the (fully deserved) physical punishment meted out to them, and with barely a visible scratch on them - they’re not Jason Voorhees and therefore don’t have regenerative tissue (see ‘Jason X’ - it’s canon)?

Look, despite the above I will admit I did enjoy watching this on my local multiplex IMAX screen, and yes, I’d probably go and see Scream 8 - but, if I’m honest - I’d rather not have a Scream 8 to go and see...

*** (out of 5)

Paul Worts